Abstract

Development of generic skills is a primary focus for educational policies and accreditation bodies, there has been insufficient exploration into engineering students' perceptions of these skills and their motivation to develop them. Typically, the promotion of such competencies relies on conventional methods rather than well-organized curriculum frameworks. In addition, the absence of a unified definition and interpretation of generic skills across various disciplines complicates curriculum design. This study seeks to evaluate the competencies of engineering students in generic skills by employing an innovative decision-making approach. The proposed method assesses students' skills within a structured framework by combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). AHP method is utilized to determine the weights of different competency criteria, whereas the TOPSIS method is employed to rank criteria according to their proficiency in these skills. The approach taken in this study demonstrates the efficacy of addressing decision-making challenges and underscores its practical utility and dependability in evaluating the development of generic skills. Finally, this study's findings determined the importance set of generic skills in the context of the Indian higher education system.

Keywords

Engineering students, Generic skills, Higher education, AHP, TOPSIS, India,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Beagon, U., Kövesi, K., Tabas, B., Nørgaard, B., Lehtinen, R., Bowe, B., Gillet, C., Spliid, C.M. (2023). Preparing engineering students for the challenges of the SDGs: what competences are required?. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2033955
  2. Bhattacherjee, A., Kukreja, V., Aggarwal, A. (2024). Stakeholders’ perspective towards employability: a hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2157–2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11858-7
  3. Brilingaitė, A., Bukauskas, L., Juškevičienė, A. (2018). Competency Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Projects of Information Technologies Students. Informatics in Education, 17(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.02
  4. Chan, C.K.Y., Fong, E.T.Y. (2018). Disciplinary differences and implications for the development of generic skills: a study of engineering and business students’ perceptions of generic skills. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(6), 927–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1462766
  5. Chan, C.K.Y., Zhao, Y., Luk, L.Y.Y. (2017). A Validated and Reliable Instrument Investigating Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Competency in Generic Skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20165
  6. Cruz, M.L., Van Den Bogaard, M.E.D., Saunders-Smits, G.N., Groen, P. (2021). Testing the Validity and Reliability of an Instrument Measuring Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Transversal Competency Levels. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.3025378
  7. Encinas, J.J., Chauca, M. (2020). Emotional intelligence can make a difference in Engineering Students under the Competency-based Education Model. Procedia Computer Science, 172(2019), 960–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.139
  8. Fleming, G.C., Klopfer, M., Katz, A., Knight, D. (2024). What engineering employers want: An analysis of technical and professional skills in engineering job advertisements. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(2), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20581
  9. Hee Lee, J., Shvetsova, O.A. (2019). The Impact of VR Application on Student’s Competency Development: A Comparative Study of Regular and VR Engineering Classes with Similar Competency Scopes. Sustainability, 11(8), 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082221
  10. Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C.A., McGovern, M. (2020). Competencies for Industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(4), 1511–1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00716-2
  11. Hirudayaraj, M., Baker, R., Baker, F., Eastman, M. (2021). Soft Skills for Entry-Level Engineers: What Employers Want. Education Sciences, 11(10), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100641
  12. Impagliazzo, J., Xu, X. (2024). A Competency-Based Transformation in Computing and Engineering Education in the Digital Era. Frontiers of Digital Education, 1(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0025-8
  13. Islam, M.A. (2022). Industry 4.0: Skill set for employability. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100280
  14. Josa, I., Aguado, A. (2024). Exploring Perceptions of Social and Generic Competencies among Engineering Students, Professors, and Practitioners. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 150(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEECD.EIENG-1955
  15. Larry, J.S., Mary, B.-S., & Jack, M. (2005). The ABET “Professional Skills” - Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
  16. Ming, X., van der Veen, J., MacLeod, M. (2025). Competencies in interdisciplinary engineering education: constructing perspectives on interdisciplinarity in a Q-sort study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 50(2), 406-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2397419
  17. Módné Takács, J., Pogátsnik, M. (2024). The Presence of Cybersecurity Competencies in the Engineering Education of Generation Z. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 21(6), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.21.6.2024.6.6
  18. Özgen, S., Sánchez-Galofré, O., Alabart, J.R., Medir, M., Giralt, F. (2013). Assessment of engineering students’ leadership competencies. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 13(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000168
  19. Picard, C., Hardebolle, C., Tormey, R., Schiffmann, J. (2022). Which professional skills do students learn in engineering team-based projects?. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1920890
  20. Pradhan, D. (2021). Effectiveness of Outcome Based Education (OBE) toward Empowering the Students Performance in an Engineering Course. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 5(2), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2021.v05i02.003
  21. Richter, T., Kjellgren, B. (2024). Engineers of the future: student perspectives on integrating global competence in their education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(3), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2298319
  22. Saleh, R., Widiasanti, I., Hermawan, H. (2019). Development of communication competency for civil engineering students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(2), 022024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/2/022024
  23. Saravanan, D.S., Senthilkumar, S., Barani, D., Bansal, D., PL, L., Ashokkumar, N. (2024). Towards Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Examining the Interplay between Outcome-Based Education, Accreditation Processes, and Institutional Rankings. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 6899–6906.
  24. Wang, N., Ren, Z., Zhang, Z., Fu, J. (2022). Evaluation and Prediction of Higher Education System Based on AHP-TOPSIS and LSTM Neural Network. Applied Sciences, 12(10), 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104987
  25. Wheebox. (2024). India Skills Report. An ETS Company.
  26. Yap, J.S., Tan, J. (2022). Lifelong learning competencies among chemical engineering students at Monash University Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.10.004